anyway, so despite what cash4gold and its scam artist ceo jeff aronson are hoping, this is obviously not over. in case you can't enlarge the rejection letter enough to read it, here's the important line for my purposes: "You may also request a return by emailing info@cash4gold.com."
done:

so that's it for now. there's not really much else to do but sit back and wait a little bit longer. i mean, worst case scenario, they disregard my email and just mail my gravel back, and i tell them some's missing and demand like 19 cents in compensation for the loss.
i don't want to jinx anything, but if i somehow, miraculously end up getting a check from them - in any amount - i'm framing it on the spot. i know you know i'm not kidding.
[Round 1, 2]
done:

so that's it for now. there's not really much else to do but sit back and wait a little bit longer. i mean, worst case scenario, they disregard my email and just mail my gravel back, and i tell them some's missing and demand like 19 cents in compensation for the loss.
i don't want to jinx anything, but if i somehow, miraculously end up getting a check from them - in any amount - i'm framing it on the spot. i know you know i'm not kidding.
[Round 1, 2]
10 comments:
Hi. This might be mail fraud. Bye.
dear mr. law,
i don't want to call your obviously expansive legal knowledge into question.
i'll just say that i'd be delighted to hear you explain how there could be fraud without misrepresentation or detrimental reliance.
looking forward to it!
your pal,
jd
Wow, that sounds impressive! What is detrimental reliance?
thanks!
unfortunately, i have no idea what it means. i just copied and pasted it from a law.com message board.
Oh, your welcome!
My understanding is that detrimental reliance is when you rely on something that is detrimental. Hopefully that will put an end to any more questions.
I'll just refer you to 18 U.S.C.A. § 1341 and 18 U.S.C.A. § 1342 and leave it at that since I'm not your attorney. If you read those and still want to have your fun, then be my guest.
russell,
you're hired.
john q,
you seem like a nice enough guy, and i appreciate your concern and your research.
to paraphrase you, though, since you aren't my attorney, i'll just refer you to the following and leave it at that:
nothing was misrepresented; without misrepresentation there's no fraud; without fraud there's no issue with fictitious names or addresses.
thanks again - seriously - and do stop by again soon.
ooooooooh, snap you.
"hold me back son"
easy, standeeman
Post a Comment